Thin and superthin perforator flap elevation based on preoperative planning with ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound

 

 Permissions and Reprints

The ability to directly harvest thin and superthin perforator flaps without jeopardizing their vascularity depends on knowledge of the microsurgical vascular anatomy of each perforator within the subcutaneous tissue up to the dermis. In this paper, we report our experience with ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound (UHF-US) in the preoperative planning of thin and superthin flaps. Between May 2017 and September 2018, perforators of seven patients were preoperatively evaluated by both ultrasound (using an 18-MHz linear probe) and UHF-US (using 48- and 70-MHz linear probes). Thin flaps (two cases) and superthin flaps (five cases) were elevated for the reconstruction of head and neck oncologic defects and lower limb traumatic defects. The mean flap size was 6.5×15 cm (range, 5×8 to 7.5×23 cm). No complications occurred, and all flaps survived completely. In all cases, we found 100% agreement between the preoperative UHF-US results and the intraoperative findings. The final reconstructive outcomes were considered satisfactory by both the surgeon and the patients. In conclusion, UHF-US was found to be very useful in the preoperative planning of thin and superthin free flaps, as it allows precise anticipation of very superficial microvascular anatomy. UHF-US may represent the next frontier in thin, superthin, and pure skin perforator flap design.

This article was presented at the 30th Meeting of European Association of Plastic Surgeons (EURAPS; May 23-25, 2019, in Helsinki, Finland), the 68th Annual Meeting of Italian Society of Plastic Surgery (SICPRE; September 26-28, 2019, in Palermo, Italy), and the 28th Meeting of the Italian Society of Microsurgery (SIM; November 21-23, 2019, in Genoa, Italy).

Special thanks to the invaluable artwork made by Antonia Conti (Medical Illustrator, Riccione, Italy).

Publication History

Received: 24 August 2019

Accepted: 17 April 2020

Article published online:
25 March 2022

© 2020. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Kim JT, Kim SW. Perforator flap versus conventional flap. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30: 514-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Colson P, Houot R, Gangolphe M. et al. Use of thinned flaps (flap-grafts) in reparative hand surgery. Ann Chir Plast 1967; 12: 298-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Hong JP, Choi DH, Suh H. et al. A new plane of elevation: the superficial fascial plane for perforator flap elevation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30: 491-6
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R. The subdermal vascular network flap: the concept of the ‘‘super-thin flap,’’ ‘‘perforator flaps.’’. In:
  Google Scholar
• 5 Narushima M, Yamasoba T, Iida T. et al. Pure skin perforator flap for microtia and congenital aural atresia using supermicrosurgical techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1580-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Park SO, Chang H, Imanishi N. Anatomic basis for flap thinning. Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45: 298-303
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Kim SY, Lee YJ, Mun GH. Anatomical understanding of target subcutaneous tissue layer for thinning procedures in thoracodorsal artery perforator, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator, and anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142: 521-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Sterzi GI. Tessuto Sottocutaneo (Tela Sottocutanea). In:
  Google Scholar
• 9 Avelar J. Regional distribution and behavior of the subcutaneous tissue concerning selection and indication for liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1989; 13: 155-65
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Harley OJ, Pickford MA. CT analysis of fat distribution superficial and deep to the Scarpa’s fascial layer in the mid and lower abdomen. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 525-30
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Lockwood TE. Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1009-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Nakajima H, Minabe T, Imanishi N. Three-dimensional analysis and classification of arteries in the skin and subcutaneous adipofascial tissue by computer graphics imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 748-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Visconti G, Hayashi A, Yoshimatsu H. et al. Ultra-high frequency ultrasound in planning capillary perforator flaps: preliminary experience☆. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71: 1146-52
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A. et al. Pure skin perforator flap direct elevation above the subdermal plane using preoperative ultra-high frequency ultrasound planning: a proof of concept. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72: 1700-38
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Yoshimatsu H, Hayashi A, Yamamoto T. et al. Visualization of the “intradermal plexus” using ultrasonography in the dermis flap: a step beyond perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7: e2411
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar